Rather then belabor the myriad ways to interpret that....
Frederick, how about providing a comparative example to Chris'?
1157722688
Posted byhthenat
2006-09-08 09:38 AM
His point is that no counter-example is needed. The solution in which the client/caller/user simply passes in the desired Churner behaviour to the churn method is as simple as it gets. Otherwise, the caller would still need to call the provideAdapter somewhere.
In the Java world there is a saying: You can always count on an architect to provide another level of indirection (to not really solve not really a problem).
Frederick, how about providing a comparative example to Chris'?
In the Java world there is a saying: You can always count on an architect to provide another level of indirection (to not really solve not really a problem).
Replies to this comment